March 2003 Archives
28 entries
28 entries
Some things to note:
I’m pointing this stuff out not to toot our own horn, but to back up standards-based markup with some real facts. I’ll certainly be sharing more findings as they come in (and yes, I’m expecting many users to be upset — especially those still using version 4.x browsers).
Shout outs are in order for those whose previous efforts and public tutorials have helped the direction of the new site: Douglas Bowman (Wired), Jeffrey Zeldman, Eric Meyer and Mark Pilgrim (accessibility).
“This note will argue that XML doesn’t suck, and discuss some of the issues around the difficulties encountered by programmers.”
Certainly a good read with some really valid points.
div with position: relative;. Regardless of what I did, the absolutely positioned div would sit flush to the left, rather than inheriting the border of the enclosing div.
Using Tantek’s Box Model Hack appeared to work by giving the left: 8px; I needed to IE5, and overriding this with left: 0; for everyone else. The problem is that the rule works for all IE5/Win browsers — not just IE5.0 which I was having the problem with exclusively.
Enter this page of Alternate Box Model Hacks — of which methods are described for hiding CSS rules specifically for IE5.0 or IE5.5. I ended up using part of Technique 1 like this:
left: 8px; /* for IE5.0/Win */
left/* */: 0; /* for everything else */
I believe hope the problem is solved.
“Browser Cam creates screen captures of your web pages loaded in any browser, and on any operating system, so you’ll be 100% sure your web pages look good-and work right-on any platform.”
A handy tool — $39.95 / month though. Also they don’t seem to have all browser/operating system combinations available. XP is not there at all. Still worth the trial. I’ve used a few times with some helpful results.
The photo on the right is of the new wing of the Peabody Essex Museum that’ll be opening up this spring. It looks like it’ll be quite a place when finished, and will hopefully continue to inject the city of Salem with some always needed livelyhood.
“Clutter is a small Mac OS X application that lets you put music CDs on your desktop. You can drag them anywhere — they’re really windows. Line them up neatly or put them in piles, it’s your choice. Each one looks like the real CD’s cover, and double-clicking it tells iTunes to play that CD.”
It’s nice to be able to view the album cover while listening. Closer to actually holding the art in your hands, but still not the real thing yet. (link via shacker)
I found it the complete opposite. For years I had been constructing nested-table-and-spacer-gif nightmares (herby called NTSG). Sure NTSG worked, but the nightmare part when it was time to tear the layouts apart and build anew. CSS allows you to create a basic, human-readable HTML structure and apply rules to the elements. Simple. I think it may be easier for those with any programming background to ease into CSS as well. It’s like “object-oriented styling”. Ok, enough preaching — and I’m certainly over simplifying. There have been plenty of times I wished to drive a hammer through the monitor because of a CSS quirk. But there are far more important matters going on in the world right now anyhow.
font-weight: normal; so that it doesn’t look like a big fat over-bolded mess. This works fine unless the user doesn’t have Impact or Arial Black, and unless your backup fonts are all bold by default, they’ll get a heading that is un-bolded and wimpy due to the CSS rule mentioned above.
Is there a workaround for this? I couldn’t think of one, and it’s a bummer especially since Impact and Arial Black are fonts that many users have — and lend themselves nicely to further CSS styling tricks. Also, if anyone has a better way of conveying “un-bolded” or “over-bolded”…
Special note: The next time a salesman who is about to sell you something says “oh yeah, it’s so easy. Just three wires and this kit and in 20 minutes you’ll be up and running” — just laugh and very carefully register that as remember to call someone to install this.
“We have long been told that using structured semantic markup would somehow future-proof our content for the day when it would be read on all sorts of non-desktop devices. Well, the future is here (itŠs just not evenly distributed, natch), and let me be the first to admit that my semantic markup is getting in the way.”
Interesting post on what is and isn’t supported by mobile devices — specifically AvantGo. It’s surprising that basic, old-school HTML tags are not supported there.
One method that I think works well is using a background image while hiding an alternate, lo-fi version of that image as I do here on this site (ie, one that has no transparency so that it won’t look like trash in a non-styled view). If sufficient alt text is provided, then non-styled viewers would get one graphic with descriptive text that should satisfy browsers and devices that do not show images.
Hiding the image with display: none; may run into the same issues with screen readers skipping the image, but one might even overlap a lo-fi image without even having to hide it, provided the two images were equal size and non-transparent — similar to the pixy.cz method that Doug touched on earlier today.
Freedom fries. A whole different ridiculous topic that I won’t bother commenting on.
“…enabled one working group to take a simple, well understood tag (perhaps the single most important tag on the web, since hyperlinks are the most defining aspect of the web), and make it needlessly different, and more complex…”
He’s got some good thoughts on the XML namespace debate going on at the W3 this week. The quote above refers to XLink and how it is proposed to complicate the simple and most important a tag.
That aside, I’ve slowly begun to realize that Chimera Camino is my favorite browser, although I still have IE open at all times as well. I want to be a Safari fan, but I think that’s a little ways off yet.
“On Wednesday last week at a meeting unrelated to weblogs, a Microsoft exec let it slip casually (heh) that the next version of FrontPage does blogging.”
Well, it’s inevitable. But it doesn’t really matter what tool you use to write a weblog. Some use Blogger or MoveableType, others like myself write their own system — and still others don’t use a weblog app at all. Many will not touch FrontPage with a ten foot pole, but it could be positive for weblogs. Then again, I can see all sorts of proprietary nonsense added in by Microsoft. We shall see.
A tiny web design studio founded by designer and author Dan Cederholm. We deliver hand-crafted pixels & text from Massachusetts, USA. Learn more